Category Archives: Racial Discrimination

Breaking: Eleventh Circuit reinstates discrimination lawsuit against Lockheed-Martin filed by white employee

July 3rd, 2011

The Eleventh Circuit _______.
The opinion is here:
Smith v. Lockheed Martin – Reverse Discrimination

Posted in Racial Discrimination | Comments Off

Can you sue your supervisor when the supervisor gets you fired?

June 30th, 2011

If your boss or your supervisor is a total jerk and sets you up to be fired or to fail, do you have any legal action against that supervisor? The answer in Florida was always “maybe,” but thanks to a landmark appeal handled by Sarelson Law Firm, we now know that the answer is yes.
I represent the plaintiff in an employment discrimination lawsuit against Arbor E&T and its parent company, Res-Care. On behalf of my client, a black Haitian American, we also sued her immediate supervisor because the immediate supervisor fired my client out of racial animus. The trial court dismissed the count of tortious interference against the supervisor. We appealed, and we prevailed on appeal.
The Third District Court of Appeal correctly held that an employee can sue a co-worker at the same company for tortious interference when the co-worker acts with ulterior motives not in the best interest of the company.
The decision is here:
Alexis v. Ventura – Tortious Interference By Co-worker
We look forward to prevailing against Res-Care and the co-worker in the upcoming October trial.

Posted in Racial Discrimination, Retaliation, Sarelson Law Firm Matters | Comments Off

Trend: Lawyers Suing Law Firms

April 24th, 2011

The blog has previously covered the latest trend in employment litigation — lawyers suing their law firm/employer for employment discrimination and retaliation. Here’s the latest example — a Hispanic former associate suing the Phoenix office of Quarles & Brady. The Complaint is below. Although this suit may be part of a trend, it is hard to imagine this particular lawsuit surviving a motion to dismiss. The pro se plaintiff has not even alleged an adverse employment action such as termination. Key dates are missing from his allegations and there is no claim for economic compensatory damages. The blog is not sure what this lawsuit is all about but perhaps the law firm’s best defense is to start with the insufficient and poorly pled complaint. The AmLaw Daily covers the story here.
But, what matters is that more and more law firms are being named as defendants in lawsuits.
Here’s the complaint:
Ramirez v Quarles and Brady

Posted in Racial Discrimination | Comments Off